today's athlete is bigger, stronger, faster...but is he/she better?

I've always wondered about how today's athletes compare to yester-years. Sidney Crosby versus Wayne Gretzky, Peyton Manning versus Johnny Unitas, Craig Alexander versus Mark Allen/Dave Scott, the comparisons are endless. If you were to strip down both athletes while in their prime, today's athlete would be "ripped". If you had them do simple athletic tests, today's athlete would probably win. But if you were to put today's athlete in the situations that past athletes competed in, I feel that today's athlete would fail. From equipment, to nutrition, to "off-season", today's athlete is at such an immense advantage...but are they performing any better?

Today's athletes receive amazing feedback from video training, scientific testing, the latest/greatest/lightest equipment, training facilities, and proper nutrition. Imagine Gretzky with a composite stick, or the latest/lightest skates.Imagine Mark Allen on the Shiv with specialized on course nutrition fine tuned to his body's performance?

I've been thinking about all these factors for awhile, especially when I hear about an athlete today being questioned as "the best ever". Today's athletes have little to no worries. A professional athlete plays their last game, then goes to the gym to begin prepping for next season. Past athletes finished their last game, then had to go and find a job, or return to take care of their families.

Then, I watched Kona 1991 the other day while on the bike. I admittedly chuckled at the clothing, the equipment, basically their overall 'look'. But then I thought about how Craig Alexander just set the course record this year, and how the separation of times from the last 10 years to 20 years ago is not that different. If today's athlete is bigger, stronger, faster, with more specific engineering and focus for their race day, should they not be incredibly faster?

There's an ingredient missing, and I don't know what it is. I would never question an elite athlete's heart, unless they clearly had given up (see: Albert Haynesworth), but to proclaim any athlete today as "the best ever" is unacceptable, as today's athletic equipment/testing/coaching/nutrition is a rather large factor in why they are good. Past athletes didn't have any of those options...and that's what made them great.